Skip to main content

c15t vs Sourcepoint

Choose c15t for consent inside a web product that your team owns. Compare Sourcepoint by Didomi's publisher campaigns, vendor controls, records and TV support.

Get started

Keep web consent in your product workflow.

c15t is the stronger fit when your developers need native web components and control of the consent backend. You can build privacy choices into the product and review their behaviour in code.

Sourcepoint suits publishers and teams with consent campaigns across websites, apps and connected TVs. It has developer APIs as well as managed operations.

Sourcepoint is part of Didomi after the announced acquisition. This guide covers Sourcepoint's product and docs. See the separate Didomi comparison for that product.

<include src="../shared/comparisons/inth-hosting.mdx" />

Compare what you get.

What you needc15tSourcepoint
Connect consent to a web productNative framework components and reactive stateWeb integration, SDKs and consent callbacks
Build the interfaceThemes, component parts and headless APIsMessage builder, custom CSS and campaign flows
Control vendorsDeclared category and vendor rulesVendor lists, consent actions and third-party tag controls
Store consent historyInth hosts the backend and stores records in its database. Self-hosting is optionalManaged history by vendor and legal basis
Discover vendor activityNo automatic scanner in the packagesScans and separate compliance monitoring tools
Test consent designsPresentation and theme experiments with fixed policy and policy textCampaign reports and A/B tests
Cover connected TVsNo bundled connected-TV SDKOTT and CTV support
Manage publisher campaignsBuild product flows in application codeProperty groups and reusable campaign scenarios

Build the flow your application needs.

c15t's framework adapters let your team connect product screens to shared consent state. Use headless APIs for your own markup and vendor controls for individual services.

Sourcepoint also supports custom code and callbacks when consent becomes available or a visitor takes an action. Its developer tools deserve credit in the comparison.

c15t's advantage is the combination of native web components and source code for both the engine and backend. Your team can change and deploy those parts together.

Moving off Sourcepoint across many sites?

Inth builds c15t and runs migrations for large teams, from the first audit to the day you remove the old script.

Talk to Inth

Install c15t. Get 42 integrations.

c15t maintains each typed helper. Most helpers load their vendor only after consent, and stop it when the visitor withdraws consent.

Import each helper from @c15t/integrations.

Browse the integrations

Start in minutes.

Paste this line into your agent. It reads the setup brief and does each step.

Ask your coding agent

The setup brief is at /SKILL.md. For the docs, agents can read /llms.txt and /llms-full.txt, or use the MCP server at with no sign-in.

Inth hosts the backend, the policy rules and the IAB CMP ID.

Compare c15t with your consent tool.

The facts about each tool come from its own published pages.

Read the comparison overview