Skip to main content

c15t vs Enzuzo

Choose c15t for native consent components, custom product interfaces and backend ownership. Compare Enzuzo's hosted scans, legal policies and privacy operations.

Get started

Choose c15t when consent belongs inside your product.

c15t is the stronger fit when your developers need direct control of consent behaviour, interface and records. You can review consent changes beside the application features that use them.

Enzuzo is a strong option for teams that want banners, scans, legal policy tools and data-request operations in one hosted service. It also offers APIs and custom script controls.

<include src="../shared/comparisons/inth-hosting.mdx" />

Timed on the same page.

Cookiebench loads each consent manager 15 times on the same Next.js page and times how long its banner takes to appear. Times read on 12 October 2026.

c15t

27ms

On desktop. 240 ms on a mid-tier phone.

See the evidence

Enzuzo

477ms

On desktop. 2.75 s on a mid-tier phone.

See the evidence

c15t’s banner appears 450 ms sooner than Enzuzo’s on desktop.

Compare what you get.

What you needc15tEnzuzo
Integrate with application codeNative framework components and reactive stateHosted script, platform integrations and API access
Build your own interfaceThemes, component parts and headless APIsBanner editor and plan-dependent custom CSS. Enterprise lists a headless mode
Choose the record backendInth hosts the backend and stores records in its database. Self-hosting is optionalManaged consent logs. Reviewed sources do not establish a deployable equivalent backend
Control vendor codeDeclared category and vendor rules for scripts, requests and embedsAutomatic script controls and attributes for custom scripts
Find cookies automaticallyNot included in the c15t packagesWebsite scans and cookie classification
Generate legal policiesNot includedPolicy and terms generators
Manage data requestsNo bundled case management suiteDSAR tools with plan-dependent limits
Run banner experimentsPresentation and theme experiments with fixed policy and policy textEnzuzo lists A/B tests on its Enterprise tier

Build consent controls where people need them.

With c15t, privacy settings can live inside an account screen, video placeholder or product feature. Each part can read the same consent state.

Use the supplied framework components, adapt their parts, or build the interface with headless APIs. Your application owns the markup and interaction.

Enzuzo offers customisation and APIs too. Its Enterprise tier lists a headless mode. c15t's advantage is the native component workflow and source code that your team can change.

Your developers can also run banner experiments as part of the product. These experiments change presentation or theme while the policy and policy text stay fixed.

Moving off Enzuzo across many sites?

Inth builds c15t and runs migrations for large teams, from the first audit to the day you remove the old script.

Talk to Inth

Install c15t. Get 42 integrations.

c15t maintains each typed helper. Most helpers load their vendor only after consent, and stop it when the visitor withdraws consent.

Import each helper from @c15t/integrations.

Browse the integrations

Start in minutes.

Paste this line into your agent. It reads the setup brief and does each step.

Ask your coding agent

The setup brief is at /SKILL.md. For the docs, agents can read /llms.txt and /llms-full.txt, or use the MCP server at with no sign-in.

Inth hosts the backend, the policy rules and the IAB CMP ID.

Compare c15t with your consent tool.

The facts about each tool come from its own published pages.

Read the comparison overview